Review : Woman In Black 2 – Angel of Death

 

In 1941, during the Blitz, a group of eight children are evacuated to the country with their headmistress and Eve ( Phoebe Fox) a teacher who has experienced loss in her young life. Unfortunately, it is very much out of the frying pan, as they are evacuated to Eel Marsh House, the crumbling ancestral home of the vengeful ghost of the woman in black. One of the children is a recently orphaned young boy, Edward, who doesn’t talk, soon he and Eve begin to see and hear strange things within the mansion, the woman in black is coming for them. wib-strip

mark2sm-4


The question here isn’t did I jump (I did), but how high? (VERY!)

Two years after audiences around the world were introduced to Hammer’s cinematic imagining of Susan Hill’s best-selling novel, not to mention the incredibly effective and successful stage play, the hate filled spectre returns to our screens. The first film made over $127 million worldwide, and is the UK’s most commercially successful horror film of all time. This is Hammer Films first sequel since Frankenstein and the Monster from Hell way back in 1973. The world, both real and cinematic has moved on since then, but if anything, franchises and recurring characters are more important to studios and production companies than ever before. Whether 007, Marvel heroes, or Jason, Freddy, and Michael Myers, franchises are considered by companies to be safe (or relatively safe) bets.

Of Hammer’s two financially successful movies in their 21st century resurrection, Let Me In, the remake of Let the Right One In, would seem to have more limited possibilities in the running character stakes. The Woman in Black though? For anyone who’s been in a coma for the past couple of years, the first film was an intense ghost story set at the beginning of the century, where a most malevolent ghost terrorised Daniel Radcliffe’s character in the isolated old house. More than that (spoiler alert for those that haven’t watched Woman in Black), in a still unusual climax, the ghost of the evil old woman did cause the death of not just the lead character, but his young son too. Knowing this audiences approach this knowing that for this film to be anywhere near as effective as its predecessor, then all bets are off. After all if a character played by Harry Potter star Daniel Radcliffe can die, AND his child too, then what hope do actors we are nowhere near as familiar with?

A main difference, and it is an important one, between Angel of Death and Woman in Black is that this time the central character is a woman rather than a man. First time around Radcliffe’s character was a single parent struggling with his role after the recent death of his wife, this time we have a young woman tormented because as an unmarried mother she was forced to give up her baby. In both cases loss, and coming to terms with it, gives the central characters a link of sorts with the ghost, whose hatred at the loss of her own child drives her to terrorise her victims and enact her vengeance. In each film the woman in black forces the protagonist to reconsider their relationships with their offspring, unfortunately she is also out to enact her terrible revenge on them all.

One of the issues some, myself included had with the earlier film was with Daniel Radcliffe. Not to take away from his performance, which was perfectly functional for the role, but he felt somehow too young to play a father (in reality he wasn’t but he had only just wrapped the final Potter films, and there was a leap seeing him in a more mature roll, although let’s be honest, his name on the posters couldn’t have hurt the box office). This time our heroine, Eve is certainly young, but could certainly have had a child. Her performance certainly offers a melancholy that may well serve as a conduit of sorts to the Woman. It is notable that both of the main protagonists in the woman in black films have this still raw loss pervading their existences.
So, Angel of Death. Does it work? Yes. Mostly.
I would certainly say that the positives far outweigh the missteps here. Chief amongst the mistaken choices is a shot that appears early in the film showing a mid-blitz era London after a nights bombing. I audibly groaned at the mercifully short FX shot. My dog could draw a better bus. And I don’t have a dog! Thankfully on the technical side that’s an anomaly and the effects are suitably creepy, as is the cinematography. The ever prowling camera gives the suggestion of being the woman in blacks POV, but you never know, as a technique it can be disconcerting, as is the hole above one of the children’s beds. The blackness in the hole, which of course is a hole into the nursery above is often shown, and you can’t help but gaze into the blackness wondering if something may be staring back.

The performances are uniformly strong, if unspectacular. They furnish the story well, and the children, especially Oaklee Pendergast as the orphaned Edward who seems to be being groomed by the mansions dark spirit, seem to be children of the era. That said, the children are one of the problems with the film. In Woman in Black, Radcliffe was left alone in the house for much of the running time, whereas here we have (or at least start with!) eight children, and two teachers, and frequent visits from a locally based airman. It almost feels as though there are too many characters bouncing around the old house.

The sense of isolation of the individual is gone, but we are left in no doubt that the children certainly, are not safe here, in fact as the film progresses it’s clear they’re not safe anywhere. A choice that does work, is the almost derelict village from the first film, Crythin Gifford, which presumably after 40 years of hauntings by the woman, is an abandoned, run down and bloody creepy place. One of the stand out sequences happens when the children are finally evacuated from Eel Marsh House to a nearby airfield, only to find, in some of the most tense and imaginative sequences of the film, that they have not left the woman in black behind. Director Tom Harper, whilst not having previous experience with the genre, has evidently been brushing up as jump scares, false scares, and the building of sustained suspense in order to maximise audience reaction is all on show here.

Truth be told not all of them fire on all cylinders all of the time, but the hit rate is pretty high. More than once I groaned at a signposted scare only to leap out of the seat (I counted six times by the way, three at least had me exclaiming ‘f***!’ Under my breath). It’s not the scariest film I’ve seen or endured this year, that honour would go to The House at the End of Time, but this is certainly in my top 5 scary movies of 2014. One of the strangest, but also potentially most welcome, things about this film is how sparingly the woman in black is used. For long periods you don’t see her at all, or just as an unclear movement. By rationing 1940’s style the appearances of the woman, it makes those big appearances really shocking, ramping up the effectiveness of the scares, rather than making the oft made mistake of showing too much.

As a standalone ghost story Angel of Death certainly works, and like the original Dracula franchise, having the monster be the only link between films, essentially allowing us to grow to like new characters whose only real similarity is their encounter with the dark lady. Here’s hoping that should this franchise continue, that it does so in a similar manner to this film. The Christopher Lee Dracula films became more and more ridiculous as the series continued, leading Lee to leave the series in frustration and despair at what he was asked to do in the films. The Woman In Black has the potential to be a long running franchise for the new Hammer if they can just maintain the quality of their stories.

Can the characters escape the woman in black, or is their fate that of Daniel Radcliffe’s character from the first film? I’m not telling you. No spoilers! Go see the film, and hold on to that popcorn!


john2sm-3


Lets be honest, as Mark pointed out after the wild success of Woman in Black, this was going to happen.

Instead of shoving a 2 on the title card and just sending a new lawyer to finish Kipps’ work on the estate of the deceased Alice Drablow. The time period has been moved forward 30 years into 1940s wartime Britain. Two teachers arrive on the island with a group of evacuees from the blitz to stay at the empty Eel Marsh House, now a crumbling ruin and stripped of all its furnishings.

The wonderful gothic set from the first film (which really was the star), has lost the creepy and dark sense of foreboding that the abandoned opulently furnished Eel Marsh House once had. Considering the tone of the scenes set in the house within the first movie, the scenes set away from Eel Marsh House in Angel Of Death are darker and scarier for me. Maybe it was due to the scenes that took place in Crythin Gifford being some of the few in the film where any isolation was felt.

Like the first film, Angel of Death does make a number of missteps, mainly it lacks the isolation that Eel Marsh House gave in the first film.  There are too many people in the house throughout the film for anyone to be alone or stranded. Even when characters become isolated in parts of the house (like the basement), it was far too quick in returning them to the group, or even cut away to different locations before any real tension could build. It never really manages to reach the levels that the first construct so well.

One thing that did surprise me was the minimal and hidden use of the Woman In Black (who also seems to of aged…) Unlike in the first film, the majority of the appearances (or half appearances) are brief glimpses. This I preferred as like the theatrical production the minimal appearances give a feeling of the evacuees possibly being watched/followed by a presence instead of the woman being just another person of the house.

Note: I have a strange feeling that there may have been a projection issue at the screening.
If I end up rewatching with friends I may amend these comments.
The scenes set in Eel Marsh House at night are very dark, almost annoyingly so. Even with my good eyesight I was left squinting at shadows, questioning what (if anything) actually was moving or there. In one sense, it worked well playing into the blackout and creating some claustrophobic scenes and moments. On the other hand, you couldn’t make out what actually was supposed to be happening.

Woman in Black and Woman In Black: Angel Of Death are 2 very different films, not only because of their time periods, but also in their design, stories and direction. Kudos has to be given to Hammer for not just producing a cookie cutter of the original with a slightly different setup, this isn’t Woman in Black: Lost in New York (phew).

Which you prefer will be up to you. For me its close, but I preferred the original film.


MIKE2

sm-4

 

 

I wonder if my lack of real enthusiasm for The Woman in Black: Angel of Death had a little to do with my overall enjoyment of the film. While it’s not perfect it does have quite a lot going for it, atmosphere, the cast and a decent score from Marco Beltrami and Brandon Roberts.

Set some 40 years on from the events in the original film and at the time of World War II, we get a rundown Eel Marsh house this time and the local village which is completely deserted. I found the derelict house and the abandoned village gave the film a more foreboding atmosphere than the first one. The look of the house now is superb, the rotting timbers, the crumbling plaster and the broken toys; while it all looked pretty creepy in the first film, it just looked horrible and you could sense the evil in every dark corner. Talking of dark corners, yes I’ll have to agree with John here, there were some scenes where the darkness was a little too much. I was staining to see what was lurking in the shadows, if there was anything of course that is. Well it’s better than over lighting the scene I guess and taking away any doubt that something  might actually have been there. But aside this, overall the cinematography was extremely good. The score added nicely to the atmosphere, and while it had the typical builds to the scares, they was a distinct lack of it at certain jumps which was very effective.

The cast was solid; Phoebe Fox was extremely good as Eve, she carried the film really well. Helen McCrory as Jean was very good and Jeremy Irvine did well in a relatively small role. All the kids were very good, well the ones that got to say anything were anyway.

As for the horror I was impressed, it worked much better than the first film for me. The scares were more fluid, even the false scares worked well. While nothing really made me leap out of my seat like Mark does, there were still a few jumps that I wasn’t expecting. With The Woman in Black and her shrouded grey face which is all rather creepy and unnerving anyway, she adds nicely to the atmosphere of the run down house.

There were a couple of things I didn’t really like, the airfield scene and then the ending just seemed a little rushed and a tad obvious as to the outcome of it all. However overall I was thoroughly entertained by the second outing of the Woman In Black, I would definitely like to see her again at some point.


kris2sm-1


I found myself a little unsure on the first WOMAN IN BLACK movie, the redeeming points were the Hammer badge, Daniel Radcliffe and what appeared on the surface to be a great ghost story and in fairness the first movie didn’t do a bad job, limited somewhat by its 12A rating but nonetheless I still found that I enjoyed it and it had a good few old fashioned scares that caught me off guard. So the news of a follow up could only mean a good thing, after all Eel Marsh House was a great setting for a scary movie.

Forwarding forty years since the first movie and dropping us right in during the height of World War 2, the movie opens well and we are treated to scenes of war time devastation and the need to get children out and into a place of safety. Where better than to dump that poor group of kids than the delightful Eel Marsh House, what could possibly happen there? So sweeping vistas of the English countryside, steam trains roaring through it and we are into the bleakest setting for a movie I have seen for quite some time.

This is where the movie in itself starts to go downhill and it just didn’t work for me in the same way the first movie did. It relies on too many jump scares and has characters that you just don’t care about and I found that even at 98 minutes it was way too much and there was just so little going on that I wished for it to end. Throwing in a love story set around a decoy RAF base and it just loses what made the first movie work so well.

Can I find anything in this that I actually liked? To be honest I’d be hard pressed to do so, again it isn’t an awful film but the sum of its parts just does not work well together. Eel Marsh doesn’t hold the same sense of dread this time around, you are not going to make your film scarier by setting it all in low or no lighting and don’t even start me on the incompetence’s of the two women left to take care of the children.

This is a film I wished I hadn’t bothered seeing, at a time when there are some great releases this just fills me with regret. For what could have been a good movie, capitalizing on what worked in the first film and building on that is lost in this unnecessary and poor follow up.


Woman In Black: Angel Of Death is at cinemas from 1st January.Final-Score


watch

IMDB

301 thoughts on “Review : Woman In Black 2 – Angel of Death

  1. Wait, I know it’s a spoiler-ish question, but I feel it’s minor so maybe you’ll answer me. lol But is that shot of The Woman In Black with the white face screaming in the nun’s outfit from the end of the trailer actually in the movie? Because the clip that was released with that scene from the movie didn’t have that scare obviously. So I was afraid it was a “just a trailer” grab scene. Then I started wondering, maybe there’s more than one dream sequence. If you could just tell me that, I would appreciate it. Thanks.

  2. Pingback: BettingGods.com

  3. Pingback: Skor Bola

  4. Pingback: vn88.com

  5. Pingback: www.kompasqqq.site

  6. Pingback: https://onlinecasinos77pakistan.com/

  7. Pingback: jbo vietnam

  8. Pingback: Ignou Synopsis

  9. Pingback: www.1mainqq.site

  10. Pingback: daftar warnetqq

  11. Pingback: sahabatqq

  12. Pingback: daftar qiuqiu99

  13. Pingback: nadapoker

  14. Pingback: vao w88

  15. Pingback: cbd-campus

  16. Pingback: Replica watches rolex uk

  17. Pingback: social media website

  18. Pingback: real estate

  19. Pingback: sahabatqq

  20. Pingback: https://www.theqoupon.com/ coupons and promo codes

  21. Pingback: kompasqq

  22. Pingback: porn videos & hot pussy fuck

  23. Pingback: Octavia

  24. Pingback: 카지노

  25. Pingback: สล็อต

  26. Pingback: https://archiwnetrze.pl/forum/

  27. Pingback: https://astrow.pl/

  28. Pingback: w88hcm.com

  29. Pingback: CBD gummies

  30. Pingback: https://mocnemedia.pl/

  31. Pingback: https://primepropertypoland.com/

  32. Pingback: ảnh nóng ngân 98

  33. Pingback: Joanna

  34. Pingback: 1929 Indian Four

  35. Pingback: Your Fish Guide Tank Heaters

  36. Pingback: SEOgine Virginia Beach SEO

  37. Pingback: https://firma-opinia.pl/opinie-o-firmach-f5/villahoff-pl-opinie-t441.html

  38. Pingback: https://pracabiznes.com.pl/forum/viewtopic.php?t=86

  39. Pingback: 안전놀이터

  40. Pingback: https://funkymedia.pl/faq

  41. Pingback: 카지노검증

  42. Pingback: https://7days24hours.pl/dom-i-ogrod-f18/cleverlink-pl-opinie-t1097.html#p4832

  43. Pingback: https://info4serwis.pl/forum/opinie-f13/literacki24-pl-opinie-t2264.html#p10261

  44. Pingback: https://archiwnetrze.pl/forum/instalacje-f35/hanmark-pl-opinie-t1769.html#p10646

  45. Pingback: https://4women.net.pl/forum/podroze-male-i-duze-hotele-trasy-srodki-transportu-f15/czartery-czarter-pl-ze-t1981.html#p12915

  46. Pingback: https://domowystroj.pl/forum/wystroj-wnetrz-f4/alvare-pl-opinie-t1688.html#p9508

  47. Pingback: https://bizhub24.pl/forum/kosmetyki-rodzaje-informacje-opinie-f34/relaks-po-pl-opinie-t1470.html#p8597

  48. Pingback: https://enterthenews.pl/forum/porady-f10/pomoc-agd-krakow-pl-opinie-t1319.html#p8273

  49. Pingback: viagra online uk

  50. Pingback: buy cialis

  51. Pingback: cialis coupon

  52. Pingback: cialis professional

  53. Pingback: Usa pharmacy viagra

  54. Pingback: Buy cheap viagra online us

  55. Pingback: cheap cialis online

  56. Pingback: is there a generic cialis available in the us

  57. Pingback: is there a generic for cialis

  58. Pingback: viagra for sale

  59. Pingback: viagra generic

  60. Pingback: erectile dysfunction medication

  61. Pingback: cheap erectile dysfunction pills

  62. Pingback: top ed pills

  63. Pingback: online pharmacy

  64. Pingback: cvs pharmacy

  65. Pingback: generic cialis online

  66. Pingback: Buy cialis

  67. Pingback: levitra online

  68. Pingback: online vardenafil

  69. Pingback: order vardenafil

  70. Pingback: party casino online nj

  71. Pingback: play casino online

  72. Pingback: purchase viagra

  73. Pingback: online casinos

  74. Pingback: casino

  75. Pingback: personal loans

  76. Pingback: installment loans

  77. Pingback: cash payday

  78. Pingback: viagra for sale

  79. Pingback: sugarhouse casino online nj

  80. Pingback: ocean casino online nj

  81. Pingback: cialis generic

  82. Pingback: internet casino line

  83. Pingback: best bonus for online casino

  84. Pingback: real money online casinos

  85. Pingback: cialis internet

  86. Pingback: 20 cialis

  87. Pingback: cialis generic

  88. Pingback: cialis 20

  89. Pingback: casino online slots

  90. Pingback: gambling casino

  91. Pingback: online casino usa real money

  92. Pingback: casino slot games

  93. Pingback: viagra canada

  94. Pingback: buy generic viagra

  95. Pingback: sildenafil

  96. Pingback: viagra connect

  97. Pingback: viagra dosage

  98. Pingback: canadian pharmacy viagra

  99. Pingback: online cialis

  100. Pingback: viagra no prescription

  101. Pingback: buy viagra no prescription

  102. Pingback: viagra buy

  103. how can i get some viagra without a prescription in the u. s.
    viagra without doctor prescription viaonlinebuy.us buy viagra online canada
    how much does viagra cost at walmart pharmacy

  104. Pingback: Google

  105. Pingback: english bulldog puppies

  106. Pingback: mac computer support

  107. Pingback: hollywood casino

  108. Pingback: viagra no prescription

  109. Pingback: cheapest place to buy viagra

  110. Pingback: اغاني

  111. Pingback: cialis 20 mg

  112. Pingback: viagra pills

  113. Pingback: PARTNER VISA AUSTRALIA

  114. Pingback: buy viagra malaysia

  115. Pingback: software download for windows 7

  116. Pingback: health insurance broker

  117. Pingback: Employee health insurance plans

  118. Pingback: health insurance broker

  119. Pingback: viagra

  120. I am extremely impressed with your writing skills as well as with the layout on your blog. Is this a paid theme or did you customize it yourself? Anyway keep up the nice quality writing, it’s rare to see a nice blog like this one these days.

  121. Pingback: physio für hunde

  122. Pingback: mymvrc.org

  123. Pingback: Fyodor Dostoyevsky

  124. Pingback: buy viagra generic

  125. Pingback: dildo with balls

  126. Pingback: gamdom

  127. Pingback: cheap cialis tablet

  128. Pingback: Шины в Кишиневе

  129. Pingback: wolfbet

  130. Pingback: Research

  131. Pingback: Viagra 150 mg canada

  132. Pingback: cheap viagra

  133. Pingback: Loans

  134. Pingback: Visa

  135. Pingback: Viagra 130mg canada

  136. Pingback: Viagra 130mg price

  137. Pingback: Viagra 25 mg tablet

  138. Pingback: Viagra 200 mg usa

  139. Pingback: cheapest Viagra 120 mg

  140. Pingback: Viagra 130mg without a doctor prescription

  141. Pingback: Viagra 120mg cheap

  142. Pingback: cialis cialis

  143. Pingback: viagra

  144. Pingback: where can i buy Viagra 50mg

  145. Pingback: where to buy Viagra 50mg

  146. Pingback: alex more

  147. Pingback: Cialis 60 mg tablets

  148. Pingback: top shelf home services

  149. Pingback: Cialis 10 mg usa

  150. Pingback: Cialis 40mg nz

  151. Pingback: christian video marketing

  152. Pingback: cialis

  153. Pingback: Cialis 40 mg united kingdom

  154. Pingback: where to buy viagra

  155. Pingback: where to buy Cialis 10mg

  156. I am really inspired along with your writing talents and also with the format in your weblog. Is this a paid subject or did you modify it your self? Anyway stay up the nice high quality writing, it is rare to look a nice blog like this one nowadays..

  157. Pingback: cheap viagra

  158. Pingback: Computer disposal berkshire

  159. Pingback: Cialis 60 mg united states

  160. Pingback: Cialis 10 mg generic

  161. Pingback: buy Cialis 80mg

  162. Pingback: Cialis 20 mg coupon

  163. Pingback: pubg mobile emülatör hile

  164. Pingback: sildenafil 100mg prices

  165. Pingback: cialis

  166. Pingback: generic drugs

  167. Pingback: cheapest tadalafil 60mg

  168. Pingback: tron exchange

  169. Pingback: cost of levitra 60 mg

  170. Pingback: Boxer Puppies For Sale

  171. Pingback: Puppies for sale near me

  172. Pingback: THC VAPE OIL

  173. Pingback: lasix 100 mg tablet

  174. Pingback: Credit Sweep scam

  175. Pingback: furosemide 40mg united states

  176. Pingback: propecia 1mg without a doctor prescription

  177. Pingback: prescription drugs without doctor approval

  178. Pingback: where to buy viagra

  179. Pingback: viagra cheap

  180. Pingback: lexapro 10 mg otc

  181. Pingback: find a builder near me

  182. Pingback: dinh cu canada

  183. Pingback: canadian viagra

  184. Pingback: abilify 20mg pharmacy

  185. Pingback: ayvalık midilli feribot

  186. Pingback: actos 30 mg tablet

  187. Pingback: viagra sans ordonnance livraison rapide

  188. Pingback: aldactone 25mg cheap

  189. Pingback: allegra 120mg nz

  190. Pingback: cheap allopurinol 300 mg

  191. Pingback: amaryl 4mg nz

  192. Pingback: amoxicillin 250mg over the counter

  193. Pingback: cach an hat mac ca

  194. Pingback: cheap viagra

  195. Pingback: ampicillin 250 mg for sale

  196. Pingback: how to buy antabuse 250mg

  197. Pingback: hat macca uc

  198. Pingback: antivert 25 mg online

  199. Pingback: arava 10mg medication

  200. Pingback: strattera 18 mg tablet

  201. Pingback: order brand viagra

  202. Pingback: vibrators for beginners

  203. Pingback: aricept 10mg united states

  204. Pingback: arimidex 1 mg for sale

  205. Pingback: blogcaodep.com

  206. Pingback: tamoxifen 10mg without a doctor prescription

  207. Pingback: buy cialis online

  208. Pingback: generic cialis for sale

  209. Pingback: ashwagandha 60caps price

  210. Pingback: amazon products

  211. Pingback: atarax 10 mg online pharmacy

  212. Pingback: augmentin 750/250 mg uk

  213. Pingback: vape shops near me

  214. Pingback: greengo

  215. Pingback: generic pills

  216. Pingback: avapro 300mg united states

  217. Pingback: best generic viagra websites

  218. Pingback: avodart 0,5 mg nz

  219. Pingback: road east tsim sha

  220. Pingback: where can i buy baclofen 10 mg

  221. Pingback: order bactrim 800/160 mg

  222. Pingback: generic viagra sildenafil citrate

  223. Pingback: generic cialis safety

  224. Pingback: benicar 20 mg no prescription

  225. Pingback: ebay

  226. Pingback: viagra otc

  227. Pingback: havuz malzemeleri

  228. Pingback: havuz kimyasallarý

  229. Pingback: capath.vn

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *